China vs Cuba: Oranges — Area harvested, per capita
China
0.0003 ha per person
in 2024
Cuba
0.0003 ha per person
in 2024
China rank
61st
Cuba rank
58th
Oranges — Area harvested, per capita over time
- China
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.0003 ha per person against 0.0003 ha per person in China, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times China's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Cuba ahead.
China ranks 61st and Cuba ranks 58th of 120 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0055 ha per person | 0.0053 ha per person | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0056 ha per person | 0.0054 ha per person | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0033 ha per person | 0.003 ha per person | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher oranges — area harvested, per capita, China or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 0.0003 ha per person against 0.0003 ha per person in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in oranges — area harvested, per capita between China and Cuba?
- 0 ha per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Cuba?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2024.
- How do China and Cuba rank globally for oranges — area harvested, per capita?
- China ranks 61st and Cuba ranks 58th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Oranges — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.