Jordan vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Olives (including preserved) — Losses

Jordan
2 1000 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1 1000 t
in 2023
Jordan rank
20th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
19th

Olives (including preserved) — Losses over time

  • Jordan
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0246810201020162023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 2 1000 t against 1 1000 t in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 1 1000 t.

That makes Jordan's figure about 2.0 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 20th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 19th of 43 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 6.3 1000 t 0.6 1000 t 5.7 1000 t Jordan
2020s 2.25 1000 t 1 1000 t 1.25 1000 t Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher olives (including preserved) — losses, Jordan or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Jordan, at 2 1000 t against 1 1000 t in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in olives (including preserved) — losses between Jordan and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
1 1000 t, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for olives (including preserved) — losses?
Jordan ranks 20th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 19th of 43 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Olives (including preserved) — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Olives (including preserved) — Losses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/olives-including-preserved-losses/jordan/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/olives-including-preserved-losses/jordan/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Jordan vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Olives (including preserved) — Losses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Olives (including preserved) — Losses
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
65 places, 880 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.