Kiribati vs Trinidad and Tobago: Oilcrops — Processing

Kiribati
29,183 t
in 2013
Trinidad and Tobago
22,104 t
in 2013
Kiribati rank
122nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
124th

Oilcrops — Processing over time

  • Kiribati
  • Trinidad and Tobago
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119872013

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 29,183 t against 22,104 t in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 7,079 t.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.3 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Kiribati ranks 122nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 124th of 162 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 2,659 t 115,168 t 112,509 t Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 4,031 t 80,473 t 76,442 t Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 5,215 t 50,957 t 45,742 t Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 5,597 t 96,090 t 90,493 t Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 15,806 t 61,640 t 45,834 t Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 25,975 t 19,296 t 6,680 t Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oilcrops — processing, Kiribati or Trinidad and Tobago?
Kiribati, at 29,183 t against 22,104 t in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2013.
What is the difference in oilcrops — processing between Kiribati and Trinidad and Tobago?
7,079 t, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Trinidad and Tobago?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Kiribati and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for oilcrops — processing?
Kiribati ranks 122nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 124th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Oilcrops — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Trinidad and Tobago: Oilcrops — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oilcrops-processing/kiribati/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oilcrops-processing/kiribati/trinidad-and-tobago/">Kiribati vs Trinidad and Tobago: Oilcrops — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oilcrops — Processing
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
205 places, 9,840 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.