Mongolia vs Portugal: Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP
Mongolia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Portugal
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Mongolia rank
98th
Portugal rank
99th
Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Mongolia
- Portugal
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Portugal, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 98th and Portugal ranks 99th of 164 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher oilcrops, oil equivalent — production, per unit of gdp, Mongolia or Portugal?
- Mongolia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in oilcrops, oil equivalent — production, per unit of gdp between Mongolia and Portugal?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Portugal?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Mongolia and Portugal rank globally for oilcrops, oil equivalent — production, per unit of gdp?
- Mongolia ranks 98th and Portugal ranks 99th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.