Kazakhstan vs Latvia: Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP
Kazakhstan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Kazakhstan rank
51st
Latvia rank
54th
Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Kazakhstan
- Latvia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 51st and Latvia ranks 54th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher oilcrops, oil equivalent — production, per unit of gdp, Kazakhstan or Latvia?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in oilcrops, oil equivalent — production, per unit of gdp between Kazakhstan and Latvia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Kazakhstan and Latvia rank globally for oilcrops, oil equivalent — production, per unit of gdp?
- Kazakhstan ranks 51st and Latvia ranks 54th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.