India vs United Republic of Tanzania: Oilcrops — Losses

India
1.99 million t
in 2013
United Republic of Tanzania
136,651 t
in 2013
India rank
3rd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th

Oilcrops — Losses over time

  • India
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119872013

How they compare

India currently reports 1.99 million t against 136,651 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1.86 million t.

That makes India's figure about 14.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.

India ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 147 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 384,971 t 30,785 t 354,185 t India
1970s 456,627 t 33,312 t 423,315 t India
1980s 583,616 t 38,123 t 545,493 t India
1990s 987,089 t 46,110 t 940,979 t India
2000s 1.25 million t 68,564 t 1.18 million t India
2010s 1.92 million t 122,693 t 1.80 million t India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oilcrops — losses, India or United Republic of Tanzania?
India, at 1.99 million t against 136,651 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2013.
What is the difference in oilcrops — losses between India and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.86 million t, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and United Republic of Tanzania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do India and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for oilcrops — losses?
India ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 147 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Oilcrops — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs United Republic of Tanzania: Oilcrops — Losses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oilcrops-losses/india/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oilcrops-losses/india/united-republic-of-tanzania/">India vs United Republic of Tanzania: Oilcrops — Losses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oilcrops — Losses
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
190 places, 9,211 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.