Small Island Developing States vs Sweden: Oilcrops — Feed

Small Island Developing States
313,285 t
in 2013
Sweden
189,800 t
in 2013
Small Island Developing States rank
20th
Sweden rank
23rd

Oilcrops — Feed over time

  • Small Island Developing States
  • Sweden
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119872013

How they compare

Small Island Developing States currently reports 313,285 t against 189,800 t in Sweden, a difference of 123,485 t.

That makes Small Island Developing States's figure about 1.7 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Small Island Developing States ranks 20th and Sweden ranks 23rd of 32 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Small Island Developing States averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Small Island Developing States Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 280.65 t 14,063 t 13,783 t Sweden
1970s 2,437 t 27,204 t 24,767 t Sweden
1980s 1,947 t 48,540 t 46,593 t Sweden
1990s 6,244 t 51,312 t 45,068 t Sweden
2000s 242,555 t 114,978 t 127,577 t Small Island Developing States
2010s 341,201 t 162,688 t 178,512 t Small Island Developing States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oilcrops — feed, Small Island Developing States or Sweden?
Small Island Developing States, at 313,285 t against 189,800 t in Sweden as of 2013.
What is the difference in oilcrops — feed between Small Island Developing States and Sweden?
123,485 t, with Small Island Developing States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small Island Developing States and Sweden?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Small Island Developing States and Sweden rank globally for oilcrops — feed?
Small Island Developing States ranks 20th and Sweden ranks 23rd of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Oilcrops — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small Island Developing States vs Sweden: Oilcrops — Feed. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oilcrops-feed/small-island-developing-states/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oilcrops-feed/small-island-developing-states/sweden/">Small Island Developing States vs Sweden: Oilcrops — Feed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oilcrops — Feed
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
181 places, 8,539 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.