Ecuador vs Slovenia: Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Production, per capita
Ecuador
0.0059 t per person
in 2024
Slovenia
0.0057 t per person
in 2017
Ecuador rank
91st
Slovenia rank
94th
Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Production, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Slovenia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0059 t per person against 0.0057 t per person in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 91st and Slovenia ranks 94th of 163 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0102 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0096 t per person | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0.0087 t per person | 0.002 t per person | 0.0067 t per person | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.0089 t per person | 0.0049 t per person | 0.004 t per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher oilcrops, cake equivalent — production, per capita, Ecuador or Slovenia?
- Ecuador, at 0.0059 t per person against 0.0057 t per person in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in oilcrops, cake equivalent — production, per capita between Ecuador and Slovenia?
- 0.0002 t per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Slovenia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Ecuador and Slovenia rank globally for oilcrops, cake equivalent — production, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 91st and Slovenia ranks 94th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.