Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Offals β€” Processing

Belarus
0 1000 t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0 1000 t
in 2023
Belarus rank
9th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
8th

Offals β€” Processing over time

  • Belarus
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
00.20.40.60.81201020162023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 0 1000 t.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 9th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 11 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 0 1000 t 0.1 1000 t 0.1 1000 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher offals β€” processing, Belarus or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Belarus, at 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in offals β€” processing between Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
0 1000 t, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for offals β€” processing?
Belarus ranks 9th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 11 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Offals β€” Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Offals β€” Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/offals-processing/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/offals-processing/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Offals β€” Processing</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Offals β€” Processing
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
22 places, 299 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.