Chile vs Uganda: Offals — Losses

Chile
5 1000 t
in 2023
Uganda
5 1000 t
in 2023
Chile rank
45th
Uganda rank
45th

Offals — Losses over time

  • Chile
  • Uganda
23456201020162023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 5 1000 t against 5 1000 t in Uganda, a difference of 0 1000 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 45th and Uganda ranks 45th of 180 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Uganda Difference Ahead
2010s 5.5 1000 t 5 1000 t 0.5 1000 t Chile
2020s 5 1000 t 5.25 1000 t 0.25 1000 t Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher offals — losses, Chile or Uganda?
Chile, at 5 1000 t against 5 1000 t in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in offals — losses between Chile and Uganda?
0 1000 t, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uganda?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Chile and Uganda rank globally for offals — losses?
Chile ranks 45th and Uganda ranks 45th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Offals — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Offals — Losses
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
211 places, 2,804 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.