Lebanon vs Lesotho, Kingdom of: Offals, Edible β€” Domestic supply quantity

Lebanon
6 1000 t
in 2023
Lesotho, Kingdom of
7 1000 t
in 2023
Lebanon rank
119th
Lesotho, Kingdom of rank
116th

Offals, Edible β€” Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Lebanon
  • Lesotho, Kingdom of
57.51012.515201020162023

How they compare

Lesotho, Kingdom of currently reports 7 1000 t against 6 1000 t in Lebanon, a difference of 1 1000 t.

That makes Lesotho, Kingdom of's figure about 1.2 times Lebanon's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Lebanon ahead.

Lebanon ranks 119th and Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 116th of 164 countries.

Lesotho, Kingdom of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Lesotho, Kingdom of Difference Ahead
2010s 6.7 1000 t 7 1000 t 0.3 1000 t Lesotho, Kingdom of
2020s 6.25 1000 t 10.25 1000 t 4 1000 t Lesotho, Kingdom of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher offals, edible β€” domestic supply quantity, Lebanon or Lesotho, Kingdom of?
Lesotho, Kingdom of, at 7 1000 t against 6 1000 t in Lebanon as of 2023.
What is the difference in offals, edible β€” domestic supply quantity between Lebanon and Lesotho, Kingdom of?
1 1000 t, with Lesotho, Kingdom of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Lesotho, Kingdom of?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Lebanon and Lesotho, Kingdom of rank globally for offals, edible β€” domestic supply quantity?
Lebanon ranks 119th and Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 116th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Offals, Edible β€” Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lebanon vs Lesotho, Kingdom of: Offals, Edible β€” Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/offals-edible-domestic-supply-quantity/lebanon/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/offals-edible-domestic-supply-quantity/lebanon/lesotho/">Lebanon vs Lesotho, Kingdom of: Offals, Edible β€” Domestic supply quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Offals, Edible β€” Domestic supply quantity
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 2,901 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.