Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Sweden: Oats β€” Feed

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
44 1000 t
in 2023
Sweden
155 1000 t
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
22nd
Sweden rank
21st

Oats β€” Feed over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Sweden
0200400600201020162023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 155 1000 t against 44 1000 t in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 111 1000 t.

That makes Sweden's figure about 3.5 times Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 22nd and Sweden ranks 21st of 31 groups.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Sweden Difference Ahead
2010s 96.3 1000 t 417.3 1000 t 321 1000 t Sweden
2020s 25.25 1000 t 320.75 1000 t 295.5 1000 t Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oats β€” feed, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Sweden?
Sweden, at 155 1000 t against 44 1000 t in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in oats β€” feed between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Sweden?
111 1000 t, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Sweden?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Sweden rank globally for oats β€” feed?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 22nd and Sweden ranks 21st of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Oats β€” Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Sweden: Oats β€” Feed. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oats-feed/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oats-feed/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/sweden/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Sweden: Oats β€” Feed</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oats β€” Feed
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
178 places, 2,283 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.