Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia

Botswana
0.2 million No
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.2 million No
in 2023
Botswana rank
114th
Equatorial Guinea rank
114th

Number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia over time

  • Botswana
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.050.10.150.2200020112023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.2 million No against 0.2 million No in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 million No.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Botswana ranks 114th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 114th of 147 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 0.16 million No 0.1 million No 0.06 million No Botswana
2010s 0.2 million No 0.11 million No 0.09 million No Botswana
2020s 0.2 million No 0.2 million No 0 million No

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia, Botswana or Equatorial Guinea?
Botswana, at 0.2 million No against 0.2 million No in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia between Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
0 million No, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia?
Botswana ranks 114th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 114th of 147 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia (million) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-affected-by-anemia-million-value/botswana/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-affected-by-anemia-million-value/botswana/equatorial-guinea/">Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia (million) — Value
Unit
million No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
201 places, 4,770 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.