Belarus vs Guatemala: Number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia
Number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia over time
- Belarus
- Guatemala
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.5 million No against 0.5 million No in Guatemala, a difference of 0 million No.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guatemala ahead.
Belarus ranks 86th and Guatemala ranks 86th of 147 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.49 million No | 0.47 million No | 0.02 million No | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.4 million No | 0.34 million No | 0.06 million No | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.425 million No | 0.45 million No | 0.025 million No | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia, Belarus or Guatemala?
- Belarus, at 0.5 million No against 0.5 million No in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia between Belarus and Guatemala?
- 0 million No, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Guatemala?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Guatemala rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia?
- Belarus ranks 86th and Guatemala ranks 86th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) affected by anemia (million) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.