New Zealand vs Palestine: Number of severely food insecure people (million) (3-year average)

New Zealand
0.3 million No
in 2023
Palestine
0.3 million No
in 2021
New Zealand rank
73rd
Palestine rank
73rd

Number of severely food insecure people (million) (3-year average) over time

  • New Zealand
  • Palestine
00.10.20.3201420182023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.3 million No against 0.3 million No in Palestine, a difference of 0 million No.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 73rd and Palestine ranks 73rd of 94 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Palestine Difference Ahead
2010s 0.275 million No 0.2 million No 0.075 million No New Zealand
2020s 0.2 million No 0.3 million No 0.1 million No Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of severely food insecure people (million) (3-year average), New Zealand or Palestine?
New Zealand, at 0.3 million No against 0.3 million No in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in number of severely food insecure people (million) (3-year average) between New Zealand and Palestine?
0 million No, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Palestine?
6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
How do New Zealand and Palestine rank globally for number of severely food insecure people (million) (3-year average)?
New Zealand ranks 73rd and Palestine ranks 73rd of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Number of severely food insecure people (million) (3-year average) — Confidence interval: Upper bound. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Palestine: Number of severely food insecure people (million) (3-year average). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-severely-food-insecure-people-million-3-year-average-confidence-interval-upper/new-zealand/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-severely-food-insecure-people-million-3-year-average-confidence-interval-upper/new-zealand/west-bank-and-gaza/">New Zealand vs Palestine: Number of severely food insecure people (million) (3-year average)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of severely food insecure people (million) (3-year average) — Confidence interval: Upper bound
Unit
million No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
141 places, 1,293 data points, 2014–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.