El Salvador vs Tajikistan: Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (million)

El Salvador
2.9 million No
in 2023
Tajikistan
3 million No
in 2023
El Salvador rank
62nd
Tajikistan rank
61st

Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (million) over time

  • El Salvador
  • Tajikistan
01234201420182023

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 3 million No against 2.9 million No in El Salvador, a difference of 0.1 million No.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 62nd and Tajikistan ranks 61st of 113 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2010s 2.88 million No 2.78 million No 0.1 million No El Salvador
2020s 3.12 million No 3.2 million No 0.075 million No Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of moderately or severely food insecure people (million), El Salvador or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 3 million No against 2.9 million No in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in number of moderately or severely food insecure people (million) between El Salvador and Tajikistan?
0.1 million No, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Tajikistan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Tajikistan rank globally for number of moderately or severely food insecure people (million)?
El Salvador ranks 62nd and Tajikistan ranks 61st of 113 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (million) (3-year average) — Confidence interval: Upper bound. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Tajikistan: Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (million). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-moderately-or-severely-food-insecure-people-million-3-year-average-confidence-2/el-salvador/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-moderately-or-severely-food-insecure-people-million-3-year-average-confidence-2/el-salvador/tajikistan/">El Salvador vs Tajikistan: Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (million)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (million) (3-year average) — Confidence interval: Upper bound
Unit
million No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
161 places, 1,512 data points, 2014–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.