Chad vs Southern Africa: Number of moderately or severely food insecure female adults

Chad
3.5 million No
in 2023
Southern Africa
6.8 million No
in 2023
Chad rank
27th
Southern Africa rank
30th

Number of moderately or severely food insecure female adults over time

  • Chad
  • Southern Africa
0246201420182023

How they compare

Southern Africa currently reports 6.8 million No against 3.5 million No in Chad, a difference of 3.3 million No.

That makes Southern Africa's figure about 1.9 times Chad's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Southern Africa has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 27th and Southern Africa ranks 30th of 103 countries.

Southern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Southern Africa Difference Ahead
2010s 2.98 million No 5.57 million No 2.58 million No Southern Africa
2020s 3.3 million No 6.47 million No 3.17 million No Southern Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of moderately or severely food insecure female adults, Chad or Southern Africa?
Southern Africa, at 6.8 million No against 3.5 million No in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in number of moderately or severely food insecure female adults between Chad and Southern Africa?
3.3 million No, with Southern Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Southern Africa?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Chad and Southern Africa rank globally for number of moderately or severely food insecure female adults?
Chad ranks 27th and Southern Africa ranks 30th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Number of moderately or severely food insecure female adults (million) (3-year average) — Confidence interval: Lower bound. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Southern Africa: Number of moderately or severely food insecure female adults. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-moderately-or-severely-food-insecure-female-adults-million-3-year-average/chad/southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-moderately-or-severely-food-insecure-female-adults-million-3-year-average/chad/southern-africa/">Chad vs Southern Africa: Number of moderately or severely food insecure female adults</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of moderately or severely food insecure female adults (million) (3-year average) — Confidence interval: Lower bound
Unit
million No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
150 places, 1,390 data points, 2014–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.