Eswatini vs Sudan: Non-food production index

Eswatini
54.2 gross, 1999-2001 = 100
in 2011
Sudan
54.03 gross, 1999-2001 = 100
in 2010
Eswatini rank
46th
Sudan rank
47th

Non-food production index over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sudan
02004006008001.0k196119862011

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 54.2 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 against 54.03 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in Sudan, a difference of 0.17 gross, 1999-2001 = 100.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 46th and Sudan ranks 47th of 51 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sudan Difference Ahead
1960s 185.93 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 106.5 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 79.43 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Eswatini
1970s 406.16 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 129.48 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 276.68 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Eswatini
1980s 500.06 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 103.09 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 396.97 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Eswatini
1990s 497.02 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 72.41 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 424.61 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Eswatini
2000s 115.94 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 82.07 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 33.87 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Eswatini
2010s 53.94 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 54.03 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 0.09 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non-food production index, Eswatini or Sudan?
Eswatini, at 54.2 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 against 54.03 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in Sudan as of 2011.
What is the difference in non-food production index between Eswatini and Sudan?
0.17 gross, 1999-2001 = 100, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan?
50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2010.
How do Eswatini and Sudan rank globally for non-food production index?
Eswatini ranks 46th and Sudan ranks 47th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, Production Yearbook and data files, published as Non-food production index (gross, 1999-2001 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sudan: Non-food production index. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, Production Yearbook and data files. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-production-index-gross-1999-2001-100/eswatini/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-production-index-gross-1999-2001-100/eswatini/sudan/">Eswatini vs Sudan: Non-food production index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non-food production index (gross, 1999-2001 = 100)
Unit
gross, 1999-2001 = 100
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, Production Yearbook and data files
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
52 places, 2,578 data points, 1961–2011
Last refreshed

Non-food production index covers non-food items. All the indices at the country, regional and world levels are calculated by the Laspeyres formula. Production quantities of each commodity are weighted by 2004-2006 average international commodity prices and summed for each year. To obtain the index, the aggregate for a given year is divided by the average aggregate for the base period 2004-2006. It should be noted that when calculating indices of agricultural, food and nonfood production, all intermediate primary inputs of agricultural origin are deducted. However, for indices of any other commodity group, only inputs originating from within the same group are deducted; thus, only seed is removed from the group “crops” and from all crop subgroups, such as cereals, oil crops, etc.; and both feed and seed originating from within the livestock sector (e.g. milk feed, hatching eggs) are removed from the group “livestock products”. For the main two livestock subgroups, namely, meat and milk, only feed originating from the respective subgroup is removed. The ""international commodity prices” are used in order to avoid the use of exchange rates for obtaining continental and world aggregates, and also to improve and facilitate international comparative analysis of productivity at the national level. These” international prices”, expressed in so-called ""international dollars”, are derived using a Geary-Khamis formula for the agricultural sector. This method assigns a single “price” to each commodity. For example, one metric ton of wheat has the same price regardless of the country where it was produced. The currency unit in which the prices are expressed has no influence on the indices published. The indices are calculated from production data presented on a calendar year basis. Aggregates are the sum of available data.