Equatorial Guinea vs Kenya: Non-food production index

Equatorial Guinea
103.63 gross, 1999-2001 = 100
in 2011
Kenya
106.73 gross, 1999-2001 = 100
in 2011
Equatorial Guinea rank
27th
Kenya rank
26th

Non-food production index over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Kenya
050100150200196119862011

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 106.73 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 against 103.63 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 3.1 gross, 1999-2001 = 100.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 27th and Kenya ranks 26th of 51 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Kenya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 172.7 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 26.83 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 145.87 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Equatorial Guinea
1970s 145.5 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 41.95 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 103.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Equatorial Guinea
1980s 162.02 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 67.7 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 94.31 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Equatorial Guinea
1990s 121.68 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 85.3 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 36.38 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Equatorial Guinea
2000s 111.36 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 97.34 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 14.02 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Equatorial Guinea
2010s 101.12 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 108.97 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 7.85 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non-food production index, Equatorial Guinea or Kenya?
Kenya, at 106.73 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 against 103.63 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2011.
What is the difference in non-food production index between Equatorial Guinea and Kenya?
3.1 gross, 1999-2001 = 100, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kenya?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Kenya rank globally for non-food production index?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 27th and Kenya ranks 26th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, Production Yearbook and data files, published as Non-food production index (gross, 1999-2001 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Kenya: Non-food production index. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, Production Yearbook and data files. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-production-index-gross-1999-2001-100/equatorial-guinea/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-production-index-gross-1999-2001-100/equatorial-guinea/kenya/">Equatorial Guinea vs Kenya: Non-food production index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non-food production index (gross, 1999-2001 = 100)
Unit
gross, 1999-2001 = 100
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, Production Yearbook and data files
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
52 places, 2,578 data points, 1961–2011
Last refreshed

Non-food production index covers non-food items. All the indices at the country, regional and world levels are calculated by the Laspeyres formula. Production quantities of each commodity are weighted by 2004-2006 average international commodity prices and summed for each year. To obtain the index, the aggregate for a given year is divided by the average aggregate for the base period 2004-2006. It should be noted that when calculating indices of agricultural, food and nonfood production, all intermediate primary inputs of agricultural origin are deducted. However, for indices of any other commodity group, only inputs originating from within the same group are deducted; thus, only seed is removed from the group “crops” and from all crop subgroups, such as cereals, oil crops, etc.; and both feed and seed originating from within the livestock sector (e.g. milk feed, hatching eggs) are removed from the group “livestock products”. For the main two livestock subgroups, namely, meat and milk, only feed originating from the respective subgroup is removed. The ""international commodity prices” are used in order to avoid the use of exchange rates for obtaining continental and world aggregates, and also to improve and facilitate international comparative analysis of productivity at the national level. These” international prices”, expressed in so-called ""international dollars”, are derived using a Geary-Khamis formula for the agricultural sector. This method assigns a single “price” to each commodity. For example, one metric ton of wheat has the same price regardless of the country where it was produced. The currency unit in which the prices are expressed has no influence on the indices published. The indices are calculated from production data presented on a calendar year basis. Aggregates are the sum of available data.