How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Sweden?

57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Portugal vs Sweden: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … unit GDP US

Portugal

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2018

Sweden

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2017

Portugal rank

104th

Sweden rank

106th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … unit GDP US over time

Portugal
Sweden

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Sweden, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.3 times Sweden's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Portugal ranks 104th and Sweden ranks 106th of 111 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Portugal	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Portugal
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Portugal
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Portugal
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Portugal
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Portugal
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Portugal or Sweden?: Portugal, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Sweden as of 2018.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Portugal and Sweden?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Sweden?: 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Portugal and Sweden rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Portugal ranks 104th and Sweden ranks 106th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Sweden: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/portugal/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/portugal/sweden/">Portugal vs Sweden: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 112 places, 5,792 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.