How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ecuador?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Ecuador: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … unit GDP US

China

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Ecuador

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

China rank

28th

Ecuador rank

27th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … unit GDP US over time

China
Ecuador

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 28th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 111 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 6 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Ecuador	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), China or Ecuador?: Ecuador, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between China and Ecuador?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ecuador?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China and Ecuador rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: China ranks 28th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Ecuador: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/ecuador/">China vs Ecuador: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 112 places, 5,792 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.