How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Portugal?

57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs Portugal: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … unit GDP US

Austria

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2017

Portugal

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2018

Austria rank

101st

Portugal rank

104th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … unit GDP US over time

Austria
Portugal

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Portugal, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Austria's figure about 2.3 times Portugal's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 101st and Portugal ranks 104th of 111 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	Portugal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Portugal
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Portugal
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Portugal
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Portugal
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Portugal
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Austria or Portugal?: Austria, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Portugal as of 2017.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Austria and Portugal?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Portugal?: 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Austria and Portugal rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Austria ranks 101st and Portugal ranks 104th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Portugal: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/austria/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/austria/portugal/">Austria vs Portugal: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 112 places, 5,792 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.