How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and China?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs China: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … unit GDP US

Australia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

China

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Australia rank

29th

China rank

28th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … unit GDP US over time

Australia
China

How they compare

China currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Australia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 29th and China ranks 28th of 111 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and China in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	China	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Australia
1970s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Australia
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Australia or China?: China, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Australia and China?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and China?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and China rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Australia ranks 29th and China ranks 28th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs China: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/china/">Australia vs China: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 112 places, 5,792 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.