How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Bhutan?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Argentina vs Bhutan: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … unit GDP US

Argentina

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bhutan

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Argentina rank

32nd

Bhutan rank

33rd

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … unit GDP US over time

Argentina
Bhutan

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Bhutan, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 32nd and Bhutan ranks 33rd of 111 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Bhutan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Argentina	Bhutan	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Argentina
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Argentina
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Argentina
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Argentina
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Argentina or Bhutan?: Argentina, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Bhutan as of 2024.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Argentina and Bhutan?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Bhutan?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Bhutan rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Argentina ranks 32nd and Bhutan ranks 33rd of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Bhutan: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/bhutan/">Argentina vs Bhutan: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 112 places, 5,792 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.