Poland vs Tunisia: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Poland
0.1268 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.1122 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland rank
48th
Tunisia rank
50th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Poland
  • Tunisia
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 0.1268 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1122 1000 USD per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0146 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 48th and Tunisia ranks 50th of 111 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5092 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0596 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4496 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
1970s 0.6247 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0931 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5316 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
1980s 0.7255 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1386 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.587 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
1990s 0.3274 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1305 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1969 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
2000s 0.2273 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1153 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.112 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
2010s 0.2372 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1165 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1207 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
2020s 0.137 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1132 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0238 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Poland or Tunisia?
Poland, at 0.1268 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1122 1000 USD per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Poland and Tunisia?
0.0146 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Poland and Tunisia rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Poland ranks 48th and Tunisia ranks 50th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Tunisia: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/poland/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/poland/tunisia/">Poland vs Tunisia: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
112 places, 6,045 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.