Panama vs Rwanda: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Panama
0.1329 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.1178 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
46th
Rwanda rank
49th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Panama
  • Rwanda
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.1329 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1178 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0151 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 46th and Rwanda ranks 49th of 111 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0396 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0203 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0193 1000 USD per square kilometre Panama
1970s 0.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0384 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0116 1000 USD per square kilometre Panama
1980s 0.0711 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0676 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0035 1000 USD per square kilometre Panama
1990s 0.1011 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0846 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0165 1000 USD per square kilometre Panama
2000s 0.114 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0924 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0216 1000 USD per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0.1304 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1184 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0121 1000 USD per square kilometre Panama
2020s 0.1327 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1117 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.021 1000 USD per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Panama or Rwanda?
Panama, at 0.1329 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1178 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Panama and Rwanda?
0.0151 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Rwanda rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Panama ranks 46th and Rwanda ranks 49th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Rwanda: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/panama/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/panama/rwanda/">Panama vs Rwanda: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
112 places, 6,045 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.