How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Peru?

30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kazakhstan vs Peru: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Kazakhstan

0.0111 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Peru

0.0146 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan rank

88th

Peru rank

85th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

Kazakhstan
Peru

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.0146 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0111 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0035 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 88th and Peru ranks 85th of 111 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kazakhstan	Peru	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0148 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0217 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0069 1000 USD per square kilometre	Peru
2000s	0.0169 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0206 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0037 1000 USD per square kilometre	Peru
2010s	0.012 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0171 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.005 1000 USD per square kilometre	Peru
2020s	0.012 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.014 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.002 1000 USD per square kilometre	Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Kazakhstan or Peru?: Peru, at 0.0146 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0111 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Kazakhstan and Peru?: 0.0035 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Peru?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Peru rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Kazakhstan ranks 88th and Peru ranks 85th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Peru: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/peru/">Kazakhstan vs Peru: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 112 places, 6,045 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.