How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Pakistan?

31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eritrea vs Pakistan: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Eritrea

0.3013 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Pakistan

0.2896 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Eritrea rank

30th

Pakistan rank

33rd

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

Eritrea
Pakistan

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 0.3013 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2896 1000 USD per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0117 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Pakistan ahead.

Eritrea ranks 30th and Pakistan ranks 33rd of 111 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eritrea	Pakistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.2317 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1996 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0321 1000 USD per square kilometre	Eritrea
2000s	0.263 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2017 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0613 1000 USD per square kilometre	Eritrea
2010s	0.2777 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2239 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0538 1000 USD per square kilometre	Eritrea
2020s	0.3017 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.282 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0196 1000 USD per square kilometre	Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Eritrea or Pakistan?: Eritrea, at 0.3013 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2896 1000 USD per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Eritrea and Pakistan?: 0.0117 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Pakistan?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Pakistan rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Eritrea ranks 30th and Pakistan ranks 33rd of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Pakistan: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/pakistan/">Eritrea vs Pakistan: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 112 places, 6,045 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.