Congo vs Romania: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Congo
0.0045 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.0027 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
98th
Romania rank
101st

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Congo
  • Romania
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0045 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0027 1000 USD per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.0018 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.7 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Congo ranks 98th and Romania ranks 101st of 111 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0036 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3501 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3465 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0.0057 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4164 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4107 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.0027 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4048 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4022 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.0017 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2338 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2321 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0027 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3797 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.377 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.0042 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3528 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3486 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2020s 0.0044 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Congo or Romania?
Congo, at 0.0045 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0027 1000 USD per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Congo and Romania?
0.0018 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Romania?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Romania rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Congo ranks 98th and Romania ranks 101st of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Romania: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/romania/">Congo vs Romania: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
112 places, 6,045 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.