Colombia vs Iceland: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Colombia
0.0266 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0265 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
74th
Iceland rank
75th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Colombia
  • Iceland
0.020.040.060.080.10.12196119922023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 0.0266 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0265 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0001 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Colombia ranks 74th and Iceland ranks 75th of 111 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Iceland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0555 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1093 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0538 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.0747 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0718 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0029 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia
1980s 0.0608 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.074 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0132 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0543 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0491 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0052 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 0.0489 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0401 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0088 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 0.0383 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0428 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0044 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.0284 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0347 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0063 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Colombia or Iceland?
Colombia, at 0.0266 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0265 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Colombia and Iceland?
0.0001 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Iceland rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Colombia ranks 74th and Iceland ranks 75th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Iceland: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/iceland/">Colombia vs Iceland: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
112 places, 6,045 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.