China vs New Zealand: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

China
1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
1.71 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
7th
New Zealand rank
6th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • China
  • New Zealand
012345196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1.71 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.1 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

China ranks 7th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 111 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3816 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.89 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.51 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.5811 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.43 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 1.12 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.61 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.5 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 1.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.96 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 1.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 1.98 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.047 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2633 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), China or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 1.71 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between China and New Zealand?
0.1 1000 USD per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and New Zealand rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
China ranks 7th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs New Zealand: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/new-zealand/">China vs New Zealand: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
112 places, 6,045 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.