Brazil vs Malawi: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Brazil
0.2682 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
0.2528 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
34th
Malawi rank
35th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Brazil
  • Malawi
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.2682 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2528 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.0154 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 34th and Malawi ranks 35th of 111 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1357 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.037 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0987 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.1789 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0776 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1013 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.2018 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1427 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0591 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.2208 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2549 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0341 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 0.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2455 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0645 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.3138 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2558 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0581 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.2716 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2166 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.055 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Brazil or Malawi?
Brazil, at 0.2682 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2528 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Brazil and Malawi?
0.0154 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Malawi rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Brazil ranks 34th and Malawi ranks 35th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Malawi: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/malawi/">Brazil vs Malawi: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
112 places, 6,045 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.