Brazil vs Cameroon: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Brazil
0.2682 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon
0.2961 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
34th
Cameroon rank
31st

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Brazil
  • Cameroon
0.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0.2961 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2682 1000 USD per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0279 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 34th and Cameroon ranks 31st of 111 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 5 and Cameroon in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Cameroon Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1357 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0811 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0546 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.1789 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1021 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0768 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.2018 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1144 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0874 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.2228 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2374 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0147 1000 USD per square kilometre Cameroon
2000s 0.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2807 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0293 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.3138 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2913 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0225 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.2716 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.282 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0105 1000 USD per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Brazil or Cameroon?
Cameroon, at 0.2961 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2682 1000 USD per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Brazil and Cameroon?
0.0279 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Cameroon?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Cameroon rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Brazil ranks 34th and Cameroon ranks 31st of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Cameroon: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/cameroon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/cameroon/">Brazil vs Cameroon: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
112 places, 6,045 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.