Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mauritius: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0251 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.0195 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
77th
Mauritius rank
80th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Mauritius
0123196119922023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.0251 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0195 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0056 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.3 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritius ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 77th and Mauritius ranks 80th of 111 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1044 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.69 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.1185 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9702 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8518 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0664 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6204 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.554 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0347 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0195 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0151 1000 USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Mauritius?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.0251 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0195 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mauritius?
0.0056 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mauritius?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mauritius rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 77th and Mauritius ranks 80th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mauritius: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mauritius/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mauritius: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
112 places, 6,045 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.