How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?

30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Croatia: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Belarus

0.0754 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Croatia

0.1004 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

56th

Croatia rank

53rd

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

Belarus
Croatia

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.1004 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0754 1000 USD per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.025 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Croatia's figure about 1.3 times Belarus's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 56th and Croatia ranks 53rd of 111 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Croatia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0006 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2519 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2513 1000 USD per square kilometre	Croatia
2000s	0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.27 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2698 1000 USD per square kilometre	Croatia
2010s	0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.231 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2308 1000 USD per square kilometre	Croatia
2020s	0.0855 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1506 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0651 1000 USD per square kilometre	Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Belarus or Croatia?: Croatia, at 0.1004 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0754 1000 USD per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Belarus and Croatia?: 0.025 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Croatia rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Belarus ranks 56th and Croatia ranks 53rd of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Croatia: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/croatia/">Belarus vs Croatia: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 112 places, 6,045 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.