Australia vs Brazil: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Australia
0.2049 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
0.2682 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
37th
Brazil rank
34th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Australia
  • Brazil
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.2682 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2049 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0633 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 37th and Brazil ranks 34th of 111 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Brazil in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Brazil Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5294 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1357 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3937 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.5228 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1789 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3439 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.5312 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2018 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3294 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.5459 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2228 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3231 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.3138 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.2315 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3138 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0824 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.2059 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2716 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0657 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Australia or Brazil?
Brazil, at 0.2682 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2049 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Australia and Brazil?
0.0633 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Brazil?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Brazil rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Australia ranks 37th and Brazil ranks 34th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Brazil: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/brazil/">Australia vs Brazil: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
112 places, 6,045 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.