How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Zimbabwe?

45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita US

Uruguay

0.0237 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0.0409 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Uruguay rank

6th

Zimbabwe rank

5th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita US over time

Uruguay
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0409 1000 USD per person against 0.0237 1000 USD per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0172 1000 USD per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.7 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Uruguay ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 111 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Uruguay averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Uruguay	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0998 1000 USD per person	0.0652 1000 USD per person	0.0346 1000 USD per person	Uruguay
1970s	0.0733 1000 USD per person	0.039 1000 USD per person	0.0344 1000 USD per person	Uruguay
1980s	0.0868 1000 USD per person	0.0372 1000 USD per person	0.0496 1000 USD per person	Uruguay
1990s	0.0984 1000 USD per person	0.0369 1000 USD per person	0.0615 1000 USD per person	Uruguay
2010s	0.0317 1000 USD per person	0.0315 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	Uruguay
2020s	0.0248 1000 USD per person	0.035 1000 USD per person	0.0102 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Uruguay or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0.0409 1000 USD per person against 0.0237 1000 USD per person in Uruguay as of 2024.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Uruguay and Zimbabwe?: 0.0172 1000 USD per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Zimbabwe?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Uruguay and Zimbabwe rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Uruguay ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/uruguay/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/uruguay/zimbabwe/">Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 112 places, 6,137 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.