How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nepal?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Nepal: Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita US

Congo

0.0002 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Nepal

0.0002 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Congo rank

79th

Nepal rank

80th

Non Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita US over time

Congo
Nepal

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0002 1000 USD per person against 0.0002 1000 USD per person in Nepal, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.

Congo ranks 79th and Nepal ranks 80th of 111 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.001 1000 USD per person	0.0022 1000 USD per person	0.0012 1000 USD per person	Nepal
1970s	0.0012 1000 USD per person	0.0021 1000 USD per person	0.0008 1000 USD per person	Nepal
1980s	0.0005 1000 USD per person	0.0014 1000 USD per person	0.0009 1000 USD per person	Nepal
1990s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0007 1000 USD per person	0.0004 1000 USD per person	Nepal
2000s	0.0003 1000 USD per person	0.0005 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	Nepal
2010s	0.0003 1000 USD per person	0.0003 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	Nepal
2020s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Congo or Nepal?: Congo, at 0.0002 1000 USD per person against 0.0002 1000 USD per person in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Congo and Nepal?: 0 1000 USD per person, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nepal?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Congo and Nepal rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Congo ranks 79th and Nepal ranks 80th of 111 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Nepal: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/congo-rep/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/congo-rep/nepal/">Congo vs Nepal: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 112 places, 6,137 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.