Rwanda vs Uruguay: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Rwanda
0.5572 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.6239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
28th
Uruguay rank
25th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Uruguay
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.6239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5572 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0667 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Rwanda ranks 28th and Uruguay ranks 25th of 146 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0954 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 0.1895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 0.3036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 0.3786 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.4073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.644 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.5415 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7631 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0.5114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Rwanda or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.6239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5572 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Rwanda and Uruguay?
0.0667 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Uruguay rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Rwanda ranks 28th and Uruguay ranks 25th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Uruguay: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/uruguay/">Rwanda vs Uruguay: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.