Panama vs Zambia: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Panama
0.0829 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
79th
Zambia rank
76th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Panama
  • Zambia
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0829 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0.0151 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Panama ranks 79th and Zambia ranks 76th of 146 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0247 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0231 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1970s 0.0312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1980s 0.0443 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0338 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1990s 0.0591 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0457 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2000s 0.0784 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0888 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0261 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Panama or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0829 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Panama and Zambia?
0.0151 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Zambia rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Panama ranks 79th and Zambia ranks 76th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zambia: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/panama/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/panama/zambia/">Panama vs Zambia: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.