Pakistan vs Uruguay: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Pakistan
0.6594 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.6239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
24th
Uruguay rank
25th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Uruguay
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.6594 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.6239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0355 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Pakistan ranks 24th and Uruguay ranks 25th of 146 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3842 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 0.3873 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 0.4555 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 0.4998 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.4965 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.5464 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7631 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2167 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0.6484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Pakistan or Uruguay?
Pakistan, at 0.6594 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.6239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Pakistan and Uruguay?
0.0355 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Uruguay rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Pakistan ranks 24th and Uruguay ranks 25th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Uruguay: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/uruguay/">Pakistan vs Uruguay: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.