Nigeria vs Zambia: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Nigeria
0.1006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria rank
73rd
Zambia rank
76th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Nigeria
  • Zambia
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 0.1006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.

Nigeria ranks 73rd and Zambia ranks 76th of 146 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1174 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0231 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0943 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1970s 0.1181 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1980s 0.1109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 0.2256 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 0.196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0888 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 0.0987 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0159 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2020s 0.0938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Nigeria or Zambia?
Nigeria, at 0.1006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Nigeria and Zambia?
0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nigeria and Zambia rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Nigeria ranks 73rd and Zambia ranks 76th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Zambia: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/nigeria/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/nigeria/zambia/">Nigeria vs Zambia: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.