Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Indonesia
1.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
12th
Zimbabwe rank
15th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Indonesia
  • Zimbabwe
0.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 1.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.6 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Indonesia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 146 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6192 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
1970s 0.7199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
1980s 0.9081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
1990s 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1859 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.643 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 2.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9424 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 2.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Indonesia or Zimbabwe?
Indonesia, at 1.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
0.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Zimbabwe rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Indonesia ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/zimbabwe/">Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.