Hungary vs Mexico: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Hungary
0.0984 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.0948 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
75th
Mexico rank
77th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Hungary
  • Mexico
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.0984 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0948 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 75th and Mexico ranks 77th of 146 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 1.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1353 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 0.9797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8378 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1236 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 0.4992 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0916 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 0.4302 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3616 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 0.3383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2629 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 0.113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0954 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Hungary or Mexico?
Hungary, at 0.0984 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0948 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Hungary and Mexico?
0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Mexico rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Hungary ranks 75th and Mexico ranks 77th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Mexico: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/hungary/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/hungary/mexico/">Hungary vs Mexico: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.