Guinea-Bissau vs Ireland: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Guinea-Bissau
1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland
0.807 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Guinea-Bissau rank
17th
Ireland rank
20th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Ireland
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.807 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ireland, a difference of 0.333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.4 times Ireland's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 17th and Ireland ranks 20th of 146 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Ireland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0256 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6226 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5971 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
1970s 0.023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5631 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5401 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
1980s 0.0205 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5823 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5618 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
1990s 0.0194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.764 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 0.0194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.717 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6976 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 0.0194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7939 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Guinea-Bissau or Ireland?
Guinea-Bissau, at 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.807 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Guinea-Bissau and Ireland?
0.333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Ireland?
50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Ireland rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 17th and Ireland ranks 20th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Ireland: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/ireland/">Guinea-Bissau vs Ireland: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.