Germany vs Iceland: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Germany
0.0208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany rank
107th
Iceland rank
108th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Germany
  • Iceland
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 0.0208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 107th and Iceland ranks 108th of 146 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2283 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0855 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1428 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
1970s 0.2369 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0561 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1807 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
1980s 0.2965 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0579 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2387 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
1990s 0.1891 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0384 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1508 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
2000s 0.1771 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0314 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1457 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
2010s 0.1609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0338 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1271 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
2020s 0.0316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0271 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Germany or Iceland?
Germany, at 0.0208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Germany and Iceland?
0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Iceland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Germany and Iceland rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Germany ranks 107th and Iceland ranks 108th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Iceland: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/germany/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/germany/iceland/">Germany vs Iceland: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.