Eswatini vs Libya: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Eswatini
0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
106th
Libya rank
103rd

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Libya
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 106th and Libya ranks 103rd of 146 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0264 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0181 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.0483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0154 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0329 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0163 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
1990s 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
2000s 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
2010s 0.0192 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Eswatini or Libya?
Libya, at 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Eswatini and Libya?
0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Libya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Libya rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Eswatini ranks 106th and Libya ranks 103rd of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Libya: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/libya/">Eswatini vs Libya: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.