Eswatini vs Germany: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Eswatini
0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany
0.0208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
106th
Germany rank
107th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Germany
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Germany, a difference of 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.

Eswatini ranks 106th and Germany ranks 107th of 146 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Germany Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0264 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2283 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
1970s 0.0483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2369 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1886 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
1980s 0.0163 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2965 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2803 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
1990s 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1891 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1854 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
2000s 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1771 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
2010s 0.019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
2020s 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Eswatini or Germany?
Eswatini, at 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Germany as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Eswatini and Germany?
0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Germany?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Germany rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Eswatini ranks 106th and Germany ranks 107th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Germany: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/germany/">Eswatini vs Germany: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.