El Salvador vs Malta: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

El Salvador
0.3356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.3094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
El Salvador rank
38th
Malta rank
39th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • El Salvador
  • Malta
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.3356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

El Salvador ranks 38th and Malta ranks 39th of 146 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0213 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0.4967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.5359 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.4868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.3438 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3231 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.3313 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), El Salvador or Malta?
El Salvador, at 0.3356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between El Salvador and Malta?
0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Malta?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do El Salvador and Malta rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
El Salvador ranks 38th and Malta ranks 39th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Malta: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/malta/">El Salvador vs Malta: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.