Ecuador vs Jamaica: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Ecuador
0.4967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
0.5079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
32nd
Jamaica rank
31st

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Jamaica
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0.5079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 32nd and Jamaica ranks 31st of 146 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0833 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3919 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 0.1188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0.1279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5398 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.1638 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5763 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.2988 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.358 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1434 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 0.4148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0948 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Ecuador or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 0.5079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Ecuador and Jamaica?
0.0112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Jamaica rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Ecuador ranks 32nd and Jamaica ranks 31st of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Jamaica: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/jamaica/">Ecuador vs Jamaica: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.